I believe...That
our background and circumstances may have influenced who we are, But we are
responsible for who we become.
Unknown
As I continue my meanderings towards the end of this year in Second Life (SL), I got to thinking
(Significant Other finds I tend to do this when I have too much time on my
hands.) about identity in SL and who our avatars really are.
Are we in SL who we are in Real Life? I’m not raising the question as to the right
or wrong of doing this (For the record, I don’t think there’s anything wrong
with being someone else inworld. I’m
more interested in how and why we do this.)
What are the components of who we are in SL and RL? In my unscientific opinion, gender (including
orientation), personality, and lifestyles are the major differentiators among
us in either life.
We are presented with three choices about who we will be
when we first come inworld. (Far fewer than
what our avatars’ appearances have!) We can be who we are in RL. Or, we can be different. Then there’s always doing some combination of
both.
Let’s talk about the components of who we are for a moment
and how we can present ourselves. First
there’s gender. Does everyone present
themselves inworld as they are in RL? I
once read that most female avatars in SL do not represent RL women especially
if they’re naked. I suspect this may be
an exaggeration but really do we know?
Do we care? Should we care? Likewise with gender orientation, how many
avatars have the same orientation inworld as in RL?
Next on the list is personality, based on what some
residents I’ve met about the manners of others, I suspect that not everyone
inworld is as well mannered as they are in RL.
Inhibitions tend to be lower inworld than in RL. (Why is it never the other way around?)
Then there’s lifestyle.
How many inworld BDSM practitioners actually practice in RL? Or, how many who are engaged in the SL
fashion world are involved with mundane pursuits like computer programming jobs
in RL? (Trust me, I don’t make my living
by writing in RL.) SL appears to be a
place where we go to do what we can’t in RL.
Here’s the hard part. Why do
people present themselves differently in SL than in RL? I have a few theories. My first is that people wish to experiment. SL is a safe place to do that especially
given the anonymity inworld. (Does
anyone really use their RL names in SL?)
Without the risks of public embarrassment, physical harm, or financial
loss, why not?
My next hypothesis about acting out in SL is that people do things that
they would never do in RL. While visiting with the
BDSM community, I learned that some engage in BDSM practices that they feel are
too risky in RL or they can’t find a partner with similar interest.
My last theory is just because. (That’s a cop out if I ever heard one) There is no particular reason other than these
things can be done and are done without a thought being given. This idea may harken back to the discussion as to whether or not SL is a game.
(Does anyone care or worry when some plays an orc in World of Warcraft?)
What are the consequences of being something in SL that
you’re not in RL?
For the avatar, he or she can experience things that could
not be in RL. They can experience
feelings or events not possible or practical outside of SL. Being ever the optimist that I am (believe it
or not) maybe they’ll have more respect for others than they might have had
otherwise.
For the community, there is a broader diversity of thought,
opinion, and practice. The social life
and culture of various inworld communities don’t stagnate and continually
change. Of course, this is not always
for the best. Can anyone say that every
new fashion is exquisite or that every new building is breath taking. (This is the counter argument to my being an
optimist.)
Finally, what about the impact of all this on relationships
in SL? I submit does it really matter? Inworld, we take people as we find them. Don’t we?
I know that I do. I find it
simpler that way. If I worry about whether
or not the person I’ve just met inworld is an unemployed, nineteen year old,
unemployed guy living in his parents’ basement outside of Detroit then I feel
I’ve missed the point of SL.
Who we are is as important in SL and it is in RL. What is important is are we being true to
ourselves and how do treat those around us in both places. Are SL and RL better
places because of us?
As always, I’m grateful to
all for their kindness and time in stopping to talk with a stranger who was
passing through their lives.
I welcome feedback from
readers, please either comment on my blog or
e-mail me at webspelunker@gmail.com
.
If you would like to read about my other adventures in Second Life please click here.
If you would like to read about my other adventures in Second Life please click here.
6 comments:
Lots of questions!
I'll answer what I know - I'm the same inworld as I am out in the real world, except for a few minor differences.
My avatar looks as young as I feel and think, although I'm fairly certain that if you met me in RL life you'd say "You look just like your avatar!". I actually tried to "age" my avatar so that we could look about the same, but I could never get it to look quite right. My avatar dresses like I do in real life as well. My avatar owns a home in SL, which I don't in real life, but if I did, it might look very similar to my SL home, and my avatar has a bank account in SL which I don't have much of one in RL.
My real life friends tease me that I have a better animated life than real life ... but that's just based on material things.
I don't like to shop and my avatar doesn't either :)
Even though I am an artist and innovator in real life, when it comes to representing myself in any circumstance, I can't be anything but myself. I can't even conceive of wanting to be anyone else. I'm very real and authentic, both online and off.
kimba,
I greatly appreciate your openess and candor.
I like to think that except for the blond hair and red eyes, I'm a lot like who I am in RL too.
Many thanks!
web
I think you're missing a distinction here, Web (and kimba)..."who we are" is not, in my opinion, our physical appearance. I think most of us in Real Life are very different people than others would imagine, just looking at our outsides.
As a particular example: Old people. I do not think I have ever met anyone who was older than about 30, in their own mind -- no matter what their calendar age.
In Second Life, we can be the people we really are, inside where the real world doesn't see. Not everyone does this...some, like you and kimba, are "as much like your RL selves" as possible. Others are completely unlike either their RL appearance OR their true inner self...they play a role, and become someone completely different, like an actor in a play.
I am not sure how successful this latter approach is. I believe that in SL, even more than in RL, our true natures show through -- in our avatar's appearance, and in our actions.
Certainly the "I'm the same in RL and SL" approach does work, especially for those whose inner self is entirely congruent (and in some cases, dependent on) the outward appearance. I've even met a few avatars who use their RL names, or something close to it.
Oh, Lindal, I meant that everything about my SL avatar - including character/personality - are the real me. I thought I was saying that in the last sentence of my comment ...
And I'm actually doing that and maintaining that for a specific reason and it has to do with a completely separate project.
But if you interact with me in SL, on facebook, twitter, on any of my blogs, in these comments, you'll see that my persona does not change from here to there because I'm not thinking about how to manipulate any given situation or person - when I participate online I'm thinking about how to share everything that I really am.
I only mention the look of the avatar because, while I would like for that to be as real as possible, it's not easy to make it so, so I got as close as possible.
I have no reason to be anything, anywhere, other than what and who I am. And I use my real first name in SL - I joined at a time when last names were assigned. I would have used my own if I could have.
Lindal and Kimba,
Point taken! SL has residents who are themselves as in RL, others who are just RP-ing, and, in all likelihood, some who are inbetween.
I think this adds to the diversity and enjoyment of this virtual world. Although, problems could arise and feelings be hurt with people working at cross purposes.
Great discussion!
TC web
Interesting ideas! Here's my two cents, although I'll be repeating what others have already said. I think there are basically two main types of people in SL - those whose virtual reality is nothing like their RL identity, and those who act in SL pretty much as they do in RL.
I tend to fall into the second category. Sure, there are things I have done in SL that I don't have much or any opportunity to do in RL, but I do carry my RL interests inworld, I act the same way I do in RL, I wear the same clothes I do in RL (expect when I'm in 1920s Berlin :)) etc.
I find it really interesting how people choose who and what to be in SL. Possibilities are practically limitless, yet I've never really wanted to be in SL something other than I am in RL. I'm still me, RL or SL.
This is also related to the distinction between those who refer to SL as a 'game' and those who see it as an enhancement to RL, so to speak. But that's another topic...
Post a Comment